IRS Releases Long-Awaited Updates to Investment Tax Credit Regulations

Late last week, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) and Department of the Treasury released the long-awaited proposed regulations (the “Proposed Regulations”) relating to investment tax credits under Section 48 of the Code (the “ITC”). These regulations help to clarify what qualifies as energy property that is eligible for the ITC (Section 1.48-9), provide additional ITC-specific rules surrounding the increased credit amount as a result of satisfying the prevailing wage and apprenticeship requirements enacted by the Inflation Reduction Act (Section 1.48-13), and adopt various other rules relating to the ITC (Section 1.48-14). Taxpayers may generally rely on the proposed regulations at least until final regulations are promulgated (the reliance period varies by provision, to some degree), and parties interested in commenting on the proposed regulations before final regulations are issued may submit written comments to the IRS until 60 days after the proposed regulations are formally publish in the Federal Register, which publication is expected to be on November 22, 2023.

Select specific provisions are described in more detail below. At a high level, several takeaways of the Proposed Regulations include: confirming that owners of projects including battery energy storage systems and property eligible for the production tax credit (the “PTC”), such as solar or wind, may claim the ITC for batteries and the PTC for solar or wind (or other PTC-eligible property), indicating that the apprenticeship requirements that apply to many projects for the increased credit amount to the 30% ITC do not apply during the five-year recapture period, and clarifying ITC-eligibility for property that is jointly owned by multiple taxpayers.

Section 1.48-9 – Definition of Energy Property

Requirements for Energy Property

The Proposed Regulations generally take a technology neutral approach to identifying property that is eligible for the ITC. These rules will be helpful in determining what property is eligible for the ITC, particularly with respect to newly eligible property such as battery energy storage systems, biogas property, electrochromic glass, and microgrid controllers. As a general matter, the Proposed Regulations provide that ITC-eligible property includes all equipment of an otherwise-eligible project that is either functionally interdependent equipment or is an integral part of the applicable energy property. Functionally interdependent for this purpose means that each component of property is dependent upon the placing in service of each of the other components to perform the applicable function, such as storing energy, producing electricity, producing thermal energy, producing biogas, or producing thermal energy. Integral parts of energy property must be property that is used directly in the intended function of the applicable energy property, and includes properly capitalized costs for O&M roads, certain buildings, and subsea cables and voltage transformers necessary for off-shore wind facilities to condition electricity for use on the electrical grid. Several specific applications are described below.

• Energy storage technology – The Proposed Regulations specify that “energy storage technology” as used in Section 48 of the Code includes electrical energy storage property, thermal energy storage property, and hydrogen energy storage property, and provide additional information regarding electrical energy storage property and hydrogen energy storage property.
  • Electrical energy storage property – Section 48 of the Code states that electrical energy storage property includes property (other than property primarily used in the transportation of goods or individuals and not for the production of electricity) that receives, stores, and delivers energy for conversion to electricity, and has a nameplate capacity of not less than 5 kWh. The Proposed Regulations provide specific examples of equipment that qualifies as “energy storage technology,” such as electrochemical batteries, ultracapacitors, physical storage such as pumped storage hydropower, compressed air storage, flywheels and reversible fuel cells.
  • Hydrogen energy storage property – The Proposed Regulations provide that hydrogen energy storage property includes property (other than property primarily used in the transportation of goods or individuals and not for the production of electricity) that stores hydrogen and has a nameplate capacity of not less than 5 kWh, equivalent to 0.127 kg of hydrogen or 52.7 standard cubic feet of hydrogen. Hydrogen energy storage property must store hydrogen that is solely used as energy, and not for other purposes such as for the production of end products, such as fertilizer.

  Section 1.48-13: Rules Relating to the Increased Credit Amount for Prevailing Wage and Apprenticeship Requirements

  The Proposed Regulations also provide much needed clarity regarding the application of the apprenticeship requirements in the alteration or repair of projects and recapture, as well as other key points listed below.

  • Apprenticeship Rules Do Not Apply During Recapture Period – Confirm that recapture may apply with respect to projects for which the prevailing wage rules are not satisfied during the five-year recapture period (assuming they applied in the first instance), but does not incorporate such rules for any such failure to satisfy the apprenticeship requirements during such period.
  • Penalty Not Applied if Recaptured – Incorporate the rule under Section 1.45-7 of the proposed regulations (focusing on prevailing wage and apprenticeship rules) that the $5,000 per non-compliant laborer and mechanic penalty is not assessed if the 30% ITC is claimed but recapture occurs because the prevailing wage requirements are not satisfied during the recapture period.
  • Base ITC as Default – Further clarify that the taxpayer would be entitled to the base 6% ITC in the event of a recapture resulting from failure to comply with the prevailing wage rules during the recapture period.
  • 20% Annual Step Down – Confirm the recapture amount for failing to satisfy the prevailing wage requirements during the recapture period is subject to the typical 20% annual step down.
  • Reporting Requirements – Provide that taxpayers that claim the 30% ITC are required to include with tax returns filed for years including the recapture period, information with respect to the payment of prevailing wages for any alteration or repair of the project during the recapture period (assuming the prevailing wage and apprenticeship requirements applied in the construction of the applicable project).

  Within this section, the Proposed Regulations also provide clarification regarding the 1 MW (AC) exception for claiming the 30% ITC. First, the determination whether an energy project has a maximum net output of less than 1 MW is determined based on the nameplate capacity. Second, the Proposed Regulations indicate that electrochromic glass property, fiber-optic solar energy property, and microgrid controllers are not eligible for the 1MW (AC) exception because such energy properties do not generate electricity or thermal energy. Finally, special rules are provided to assist taxpayers in determining the electrical or thermal generating capacity of certain types of energy property, such as electrical energy storage property, hydrogen energy storage property, specified clean hydrogen production facilities, and qualified biogas property.

  Section 1.48-14 – Various Rules Applicable to Energy Property

  The Proposed Regulations provide additional rules regarding retrofitted energy property, incremental cost limitations, ownership of energy property and qualified interconnection costs.

  • Retrofitted Energy Property – While the Proposed Regulations provide that energy property generally does not include equipment that is an addition to, or modification of, an existing energy property, the Proposed Regulations incorporate an exception for property that satisfies the well-established 80/20 rule.
  • Incremental Cost Limitations – The Proposed Regulations clarify that for assets that do not qualify as energy property standing alone but cost more because of their association with qualifying property, the excess of the total cost of such property over the amount that would have been expended absent the associated energy property is included in eligible basis for purposes of calculating the amount of ITC. This incremental cost rule is easily illustrated in the case of reflective roofing that both provides shelter and assists with the generation of electricity. If the cost of reflective roofing is $15,000 and non-reflective roofing would have been $10,000, then the $5,000 incremental cost is eligible for the ITC.
  • Special Rules Concerning Ownership – Provide rules clarifying ITC-eligibility in situations where multiple taxpayers each own a portion of the applicable energy property, such as fractional interests in common tenancies. The clarifications in these rules may help enable more ownership structures involving both tax-exempt and taxable entity owners.
  • Qualified Interconnection Costs – Describe in more detail the requirements that need to be satisfied for interconnection costs to be eligible for the ITC for certain projects.

  Foley will continue to monitor these developments, including any changes between the Proposed Regulations and adopted final regulations.

  Close This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.